第二代制冷剂是HCFC(氢氯氟烃)冷媒产品介绍

  • 第二代制冷剂是HCFC(氢氯氟烃),它是含有氢、氯、氟和碳原子的合成化合物。 它们的通式为 C<sub>n</sub>H<sub>x</sub>Cl<sub>y</sub>F<sub>z</sub>,其中 n、x、y 和 z 是整数1。


  • 第二代制冷剂是HCFC(氢氯氟烃)冷媒产品介绍
  • 最常用作制冷剂的 HCFC 是 R21(二氯氟甲烷)、R22(一氯二氟甲烷)、R31(氟氯甲烷)、R123(2,2-二氯-1,1,1-三氟乙烷)、R124(1-氯-1,2、 2,2-四氟乙烷)、R141b(1,1-二氯-1-氟乙烷)和R142b(1-氯-1,1-二氟乙烷)2。


  • HCFC 是在 20 世纪 20 年代和 1930 年代开发的,作为第一代制冷剂 CFC(氯氟烃)的替代品,CFC 被发现会导致严重的臭氧消耗。 HCFC 的臭氧消耗潜值 (ODP) 低于 CFC,但它们仍然具有一些负面环境影响,例如高全球变暖潜值 (GWP) 和大气寿命3。


  • HCFC作为制冷剂具有许多优点,如稳定性高、毒性低、不易燃、沸点低、汽化潜热高以及与润滑油和金属相容等。 它们还广泛用于其他应用,例如发泡剂、溶剂、灭火器和其他化学品的中间体。


  • 全球 HCFC 的生产和消费量在 20 世纪 90 年代达到顶峰,然后由于科学证据的不断增加和公众对其环境危害的认识而开始下降。 1987年,197个国家签署了《蒙特利尔议定书》,同意在具体期限内逐步淘汰氟氯化碳和其他消耗臭氧层物质的生产和使用。 1992年,《蒙特利尔议定书》的哥本哈根修正案将HCFC列入受控物质清单,并制定了逐步淘汰的时间表。


  • 《蒙特利尔议定书》被认为是最成功的国际环境协定之一,有效减少了氟氯化碳等消耗臭氧层物质的排放,为臭氧层的恢复做出了贡献。 根据联合国最新评估,臭氧层预计到本世纪中叶将恢复到1980年的水平。


  • HCFC 的淘汰还刺激了替代制冷剂的开发和采用,例如 HFC(氢氟碳化物)、HFO(氢氟烯烃)和天然制冷剂(如氨、二氧化碳、碳氢化合物和水)。 这些替代品的臭氧消耗潜势较低或为零,但它们可能具有其他缺点,例如全球变暖潜势高、易燃性、毒性或效率低。


  • 因此,制冷剂的选择和开发是一个复杂的动态过程,涉及热力学、物理、化学、安全、经济和环境等多个因素。 理想的制冷剂应该具有高性能、低环境影响、低成本和广泛的可用性。

  • The second generation of refrigerants are HCFCs (hydrochlorofluorocarbons), which are synthetic compounds that contain hydrogen, chlorine, fluorine and carbon atoms. They have the general formula of C<sub>n</sub>H<sub>x</sub>Cl<sub>y</sub>F<sub>z</sub>, where n, x, y and z are integers1.

  • The most common HCFCs used as refrigerants are R21 (dichlorofluoromethane), R22 (chlorodifluoromethane), R31 (fluorochloromethane), R123 (2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane), R124 (1-chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane), R141b (1,1-dichloro-1-fluoroethane) and R142b (1-chloro-1,1-difluoroethane)2.

  • HCFCs were developed in the 1920s and 1930s as alternatives to the first generation of refrigerants, CFCs (chlorofluorocarbons), which were found to cause severe ozone depletion. HCFCs have lower ozone depletion potential (ODP) than CFCs, but they still have some negative environmental impacts, such as high global warming potential (GWP) and atmospheric lifetime3.

  • HCFCs have many advantages as refrigerants, such as high stability, low toxicity, non-flammability, low boiling point, high latent heat of vaporization and compatibility with lubricants and metals. They are also widely used in other applications, such as foam blowing agents, solvents, fire extinguishers and intermediates for other chemicals.

  • The global production and consumption of HCFCs peaked in the 1990s and then began to decline due to the growing scientific evidence and public awareness of their environmental hazards. In 1987, the Montreal Protocol was signed by 197 countries, which agreed to phase out the production and use of CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances by specific deadlines. In 1992, the Copenhagen Amendment to the Montreal Protocol added HCFCs to the list of controlled substances and set a timetable for their phase-out.

  • The Montreal Protocol is considered one of the most successful international environmental agreements, as it has effectively reduced the emissions of CFCs and other ozone-depleting substances, and has contributed to the recovery of the ozone layer. According to the latest assessment by the United Nations, the ozone layer is expected to return to its 1980 levels by the middle of this century.

  • The phase-out of HCFCs has also stimulated the development and adoption of alternative refrigerants, such as HFCs (hydrofluorocarbons), HFOs (hydrofluoroolefins) and natural refrigerants (such as ammonia, carbon dioxide, hydrocarbons and water). These alternatives have lower or zero ozone depletion potential, but they may have other drawbacks, such as high global warming potential, flammability, toxicity or low efficiency.

  • Therefore, the selection and development of refrigerants is a complex and dynamic process that involves multiple factors, such as thermodynamic, physical, chemical, safety, economic and environmental aspects. The ideal refrigerant should have high performance, low environmental impact, low cost and wide availability.


标签:

相关文章

暂无相关推荐

评论

◎欢迎参与讨论,请在这里发表您的看法、交流您的观点。
返回顶部